Talk:Codec 2
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Codec 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150619052003/http://jmspeex.livejournal.com/10446.html to http://jmspeex.livejournal.com/10446.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Confusion between Codec2 and modulation for RF transmission
editThis article happily mixes technical details of Codec2 with these of the modulations used to transport that (in FreeDV). That is technically wrong and misleading. Marcusmueller ettus (talk) 13:08, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe the confusion begins with everything being in the codec2 link library. The library isn't modularized to associate with one part of the solution. It is the typical monolith design. This has nothing to do with FreeDV which is just the GUI part. MonsieurET (talk) 00:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- I wouldn't call FreeDV "just the GUI part" but also the various combinations of modulations and codecs that make up each FreeDV mode. Perhaps in the future some of these will be broken out into separate libraries, who knows.
- Speaking of FreeDV, it seems a FreeDV page is likely to pass muster since the project has plenty of coverage. I might take up writing a draft for one, but I'd need one or two more pairs of eyeballs on it, especially to find reliable secondary sources.. KetchupSalt (talk) 08:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)