Talk:Coalition for Unity and Democracy

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethiopia High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethiopia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ethiopia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EthiopiaWikipedia:WikiProject EthiopiaTemplate:WikiProject EthiopiaEthiopia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article is falsification of truth. It is written by opponents, most probably by the dictatorial regime of TPLF, to tarnish the name of CUD. If one looks closely almost all external sources section is referenced to the TPLF media that incarcerated the CUD leaders. It is almost the same as the courts the CUD leaders are being tried. Where TPLF is the Judge, Jury, witness, and prosecutor.

This article has to be properly disputed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.43.55 (talk • contribs) 06:59, 30 May 2007

Tone and POV

If some users believe the tone or POV is not adecuate then they must place their demand in the talk page and/or disable editing due to a discussion until the case is settled and the authenticity of the sources are proven. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.42.214.225 (talk • contribs) 05:00, 22 June 2007

Factual Inaccuracies and Extremely Partisan Content

This article reads like a position paper issued by the EPRDF regime rather than a fair and ballanced article. I nominate this article for deletion and re-writing by a more objective author. It is full of falsehoods and innacuracies. Hailu Sahwel, the Chairman of the CUD, is not and has never claimed the title of Doctor. He goes by the title of Ato (Mr.) or Engineer. The original writer is probably confusing him with another leader of the CUD, Dr. Hailu Araya, who incidentally is a Tigrean and an opponent of the EPRDF.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.203.158.141 (talk • contribs) 23:30, 28 June 2007

Deep concerns about this article

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am not an Ethiopian, and am far from expert on Ethiopian politics, but I'm concerned about the tone and direction of this article. There's almost no information about CUD, its structure, its platform or its goals. Instead, there's a set of criticisms that seem designed to demonize CUD as anti-Tigrayan and associate its leader with the deposed Derg government. (The exact language connecting Haily Sahwel to the Derg is repeated on Sahwel's bio page.) It strikes me that this article represents an EPRDF point of view and that an article on CUD would represent the organization more fairly, and would comment on international condemnation of the ongoing trial of 38 CUD organizers. Is there anyone monitoring this article who is in a position to address these concerns about NPOV on this article?

Specifically, this article needs to include better information about CUD's platforms, proposals and goals. I am concerned that the assertion that CUD's leader was affiliated with the previous government and connections to genocide accusations are a form of character assasination. I am even more concerned that the footnote used to justify those assertions connects to a highly partisan blog, not to a neutral source. Ethanz 22:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

TPLF Propoganda

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There isn't any question about the nature of this article. THis is clearly TPLF propoganda. everytime i look at ONLF, CUD, OLF, etc. Some TPLF propogandist has already got his hands on it. Here the CUD is being linked to the derg. In the ONLF article somebody links it to terrorism. But conversely the TPLF struggle against the derg isn't linked to terrorism. People stop the Propoganda. You only make yourself look stupid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkfarah (talk • contribs) 22:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Coalition for Unity and Democracy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic