This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
https://sinjali.com/temperatura-me-e-ulet-ne-kosove-eshte-regjistruar-para-59-vitesh/ Temperatura me e ulet ka qene me 25 janar 1963 ne Gilan, e jo 6 qershor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.99.20.126 (talk) 07:31, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Settlement names
editStatement by one user:
- Blind renaming of places is probably a bad idea. The source specifically names these places. Can't we stick to what sources say?
Reply:
- First, we don't revert anything on account of what it is "probably", on an encyclopaedia it is what is "definitely" or nothing at all. Can we stick to what the sources say? For content, yes. For naming, depends. Naturally if a list of names are incorrect in the first place, their amendment neither qualifies as "renaming" and as such it is not "blind", the appropriate term is "correction". And correction cannot probably but can only definitely be a good
ideacourse of action, or rather, the only option. And if we ignore this, we can have selective naming, we can sometimes call the Serbian capital Beograd as some sources call it that way, we can refer to The Hague as Den Haag as that is how some sources refer to it. Naturally if a source on Bristol is published in Welsh, we can call it Bryste. That's not the way Wikipedia works. So, to resolve the problem, if an editor is not sure whether to use Glogovac or Gllogovc, he need only click the blue link and find his title, and whatever it is, that's how to report it. Problem solved. Any appeals, write to the publishers who used Glogovac and complain. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 02:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Name
editAs usual, not worthy of a conversation. Article name is Peć. Use it. --WhiteWriterspeaks 22:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Evlekis, too, suggested that somehow WP:AT prevented the use of piped links (but only selectively; it's mandatory to use piped links when the title of the target article doesn't fit Belgrade's POV). Are you picking up where Evlekis left off? Or do you have some other aversion to using the name given by relevant sources? bobrayner (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Climate of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140527212027/http://www.kosovo-mining.org/kosovoweb/en/kosovo/climate.html to http://www.kosovo-mining.org/kosovoweb/en/kosovo/climate.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140527212027/http://www.kosovo-mining.org/kosovoweb/en/kosovo/climate.html to http://www.kosovo-mining.org/kosovoweb/en/kosovo/climate.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 26 November 2016 (UTC)