Talk:Clarence Gamble

Comment

I am still busy with the details, will fill in more info today. Killerdark 16:52, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

---

I don't know about the categories. Can someone else fill the right ones in for me? Killerdark 16:52, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

---

The capitals in the Poem are original btw. Killerdark 17:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Copyvio

The article looks like a blatant copyright violation

NPOV

I came into this article with the notion that this man was a fan of eugenics who immorally conducted medical experiments involving birth control in Puerto Rico and Los Angeles with respect to race and was involved in a "Negro Project." However, this article basically defines the man as a saint. He crusaded for justice in his fields of birth control, and there are a great many references to his all-around good nature (who cares if his mother told him it's about doing the right thing and not taking credit?).

I am well aware that my point of view is biased, but the current state of the article not only is biased but leaves out some significant biographical information about Gamble. ~ magbatz 14:18, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

July 9, 2011: I know for certain that Clarence Gamble was heavily involved in the eugenics movement, and wrote at least one document -- as late as 1950 -- about human sterilization; it was written in a pro-eugenics manner. This article is seriously flawed. -- Molly B. Fleming — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.211.87 (talk) 02:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Presumably lack of discussion is from a lack of interest. Months later, the removal of the tag is still the last edit.

Something needs to be done though. This is just a terrible article in general. Just... just awful. Tracing it back and the article was pretty much non-existent before 21st March 2007 when an IP address made some changes. Compare this to this. Note especially the line "CLARENCE J. GAMBLE An Extraordinary Life by Miriam Reed, Ph.D."

Whomsoever might be reading this, don't tell me to Be Bold. I'm not going to do anything. Just pointing it out that this is really bad. 86.29.7.17 (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clarence Gamble. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111110134413/http://extras.journalnow.com/againsttheirwill/parts/three/story1.html to http://extras.journalnow.com/againsttheirwill/parts/three/story1.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.northcarolinahistory.org/commentary/315/entry

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clarence Gamble. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051221233905/http://www.pathfind.org/site/PageServer?pagename=About_Us_History to http://www.pathfind.org/site/PageServer?pagename=About_Us_History

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Horribly written article

We should not be referring to him as "Clarance" or as "Dr. Gable". Almost all references should be "Gamble". Also we should not use Dr. + name for his associates. In most cases we do not even need Dr. on first mention. Edna McKinnon should be refered to as McKinnion nor Edna on mentions after the first. We also do not need so much coatracking of unrelated material.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)