Talk:Cindi Love
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 September 2009. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Removing PROD tag
editSerpentduv "cleaned up" this article earlier and then proposed it for deletion. I have removed the tag because I have some suspicions about Serpentduv's motivations in doing so. For one thing, these were Serpentduv's first edits, which makes me wonder how s/he chose to target Love. Second, the edits were overly harsh--placing several "fact" tags in the same sentence, even when the information is clearly present in the footnoted source. Moreover, the edits suggested a negative view of homosexuality, such as the reference to Love's spouse as her "sexual partner" and a reference to the MCC as "liberal" and "pro-homosexuality." I suspect that Serpentduv's edits were NOT made in good faith. Thoughts? (By the way, WP protocal is that the PROD tag not be replaced without listing it on the Deletion talk page.) Aristophanes68 (talk) 07:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Why was every reference to her changed to her first name? Zazaban (talk) 08:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- I wondered that too -- it felt as if the editor was showing disrespect. I also don't see why explicitly pointing out that the MCC is a more liberal denomination (on sexuality issues, at least) is relevant in this article. She works for a gay & lesbian denomination--liberalism is understood in that context, and that adjective doesn't add anything. Besides, the link for "liberal" simply leads to a disambig page, so it's useless. Aristophanes68 (talk) 08:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cindi Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927011738/http://www.mccchurch.org/AM/TextTemplate.cfm?Section=Workshops1&Template=%2FCM%2FHTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=3302 to http://www.mccchurch.org/AM/TextTemplate.cfm?Section=Workshops1&Template=%2FCM%2FHTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=3302
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Cindi Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090902193011/http://www.hrc.org/about_us/religion_council.htm to http://www.hrc.org/about_us/religion_council.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614110455/http://www.texnews.com/1998/1999/local/net0709.html to http://www.texnews.com/1998/1999/local/net0709.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615011636/http://www.networkworld.com/ec/0222grace.html to http://www.networkworld.com/ec/0222grace.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614110504/http://www.texnews.com/1998/2000/biz/robo0305.html to http://www.texnews.com/1998/2000/biz/robo0305.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615011605/http://www.networkworld.com/intranet/1026legacy.html to http://www.networkworld.com/intranet/1026legacy.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726045545/http://www.famlo.org/about_us to http://www.famlo.org/about_us
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://mccchurch.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Search&template=%2FCM%2FHTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=695 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://mccchurch.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Search&template=%2FCM%2FHTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=1963
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 8 January 2018 (UTC)