Talk:Cilk
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cilk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | The contents of the Cilk Plus page were merged into Cilk on January 28, 2015. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Talk
editThere are a few POV issues - the article runs more like a press release than a statement of what the software does and how. There is also quite a lot missing, such as why this form of parallelism is more practical than other forms. I've added a link to the original, to make it more about Cilk and less about Cilk Arts, but it's going to take some cleaning as best as I can tell.
Could someone compare Cilk to OpenMP, to a beginner they seem to do mostly the same things? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.27.71.155 (talk) 20:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
External links do not work as cilk.com redirects to intel website now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.90.55.97 (talk) 07:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
There is no coverage of Cilk or Cilk Plus non-Intel architectures. It is not stated whether the GCC implementation supports more than Intel targets, but since the GCC documentation does not appear to limit this to Intel. There should be some critical discussion of this as a "portable" solution, since multi-core ARM and PowerPC (to name a few) processors are becoming common in embedded and mobile applications. If it is an Intel-only solution, it should be described as such.Filker0 (talk) 19:38, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
This paragraph is partly incorrect: "Cilk++ was proprietary software. Like its predecessor, it was implemented as a Cilk-to-C++ compiler. It supported the Microsoft and GNU compilers." The Windows version translated to C++ (with some additional processing after compilation after compilation with MSVC). The Linux version used a modified C++ front end to gcc and did not translate to C++. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 23:10, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cilk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100906030803/http://www.hpcwire.com/features/Intel-Flexes-Parallel-Programming-Muscles-102084438.html to http://www.hpcwire.com/features/Intel-Flexes-Parallel-Programming-Muscles-102084438.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:08, 7 August 2017 (UTC)