Talk:Chu Ci

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives:

Archive 1 – 2008

Creating archives

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Archiving 2008 discussion on deleted image copyvio. Dcattell (talk) 20:38, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

EFEO

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added EFEO transliteration, since these often enough appear in English language works, especially older works which rely on French sources. Dcattell (talk) 21:49, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hawkes translation

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The treatment of Hawkes's translations here should be cleaned up since he's very clear that he never substantially rewrote what were mostly student projects from 1948 to 1951. Everything after his 1955 "On the Problem of Date and Authorship in Ch'u Tz'u" simply consisted of reprints with only the most egregious mistakes emended. Even "in preparing [a] completely new edition... [he] altered the translations as little as possible, not so much because [he was] confident that they are right, as from a feeling that they were made by a young man... whose work [he was] not entitled to deface". Our bibliography and discussion should reflect that. — LlywelynII 21:35, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic