Talk:Christina Katrakis
 | This article was nominated for deletion on January 31 2015. The result of the discussion was delete. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Untitled
editOk
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --92.47.26.198 (talk) 12:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC) it was fully re-written and all the self-commercvial was removed. The page is 100% re-done and reliable sources only were added.
92.47.26.198 (talk) 12:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC) BR, Sigwartsson
Un Representative?
editI've marked that claim as dubious, since there only one source which seems to claim it (or at least one which doesn't seem to be in some sort of direct control of the subject of the article), which would seem unusual or such a claim that it wouldn't be more broadly known. The source itself is authored by one person who worked at the same university as the subject was apparently working and is a semi-interview, so it seems likely a primary source and difficult to know what sort of fact checking occured. The author also only has one piece ever published by the outlet, and it is in the "News Feature" section which seems to be an editorial - WP:NEWSORG as part of WP:RS states - "Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication (editorials) or outside authors (op-eds) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact." (emphasis mine). Other facts arributed to this source may therefore also be dubious --86.2.216.5 (talk) 08:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)