Talk:Chiltern Railways

Stratford-Oxford Line

I saw here that they operated 1tpw from Stratford to Oxford. Is this is correct? Why is it not shown on the Stratford page and the route diagram? Wilbysuffolk Talk to me 16:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Please see WP:MULTI and the reply I left at Talk:Stratford station#Chiltern Railways. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:37, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.railway-technology.com/contractors/signal/delta-rail/press7.html

  Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 11:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

2012 suburban service reduction

The May 2012 timetable brought a reduction in the stopping service between Marylebone and High Wycombe/Princes Risborough, with the result that stations such as Denham currently only have one train per hour in each direction off-peak, where previously they had two. In the midst of the mid- and long-distance service improvements as are already mentioned in the article, I feel this ought to be commented upon. At the time I thought it was a temporary measure and that the ultimate aim was to improve the suburban service (longer platforms, higher frequency, stops at both South Ruislip and West Ruislip, trains with faster acceleration – in short, something approaching an Overground-style service), but, as of May 2014, that hasn't happened and despite all the excitement about the Mainline service to Birmingham, the service has worsened significantly for the short-distance user. 92.40.248.181 (talk) 14:39, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chiltern Railways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070311030147/http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk:80/get_document.php?id=497 to http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/get_document.php?id=497

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Rolling stock for Marylebone - Oxford Parkway

This needs to be updated with the rolling stock used for the Marylebone - Oxford Parkway service if anyone knows it. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 15:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Baker Street Parliamentary?

Any source for this? I can't find anything about it anywhere, including the timetable. 78.153.35.53 (talk) 10:43, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Seems doubtful: what traction would be used? Since there is no electrification beyond Amersham, and London Transport have no DMUs, are Chiltern Railways DMUs cleared for the Met between Canfield Place and Baker Street? --Redrose64 (talk) 10:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure, I'm no expert on traction and clearances. But for a service to run from Aylesbury to Baker Street, the only option seems to be Chiltern DMUs which should, if my reading of the railway map is accurate, switch to the Met tracks already at Harrow-on-the-Hill - this seems highly unlikely to me. 78.153.35.53 (talk) 19:56, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm a bit late for the party on this issue, but the parliamentary service is shown in the timetable.

If you click on this link and scroll down to pages 97 and 101, you'll find the Saturday and Sunday services towards Baker Street (departs Aylesbury at 23:18 on Saturdays and at 22:18 on Sundays). If you scroll down further to page 106, you'll find the Saturday service from Baker Street to Aylesbury (departs 06:04). I have no idea why they run this service (my guess is to maintain the driver's route knowledge) but it does exist so I think it should be mentioned in the article.

I should probably also mention the parliamentary service on the Banbury-Oxford route (because another user tried to remove it last week). That service can also be found in the timetable; the southbound service is on page 29 (departs Stratford-upon-Avon at 23:15) and the northbound return is on page 69 (departs Oxford at 00:40). The letter R on the top indicates the additional calls at Tackley and Heyford for the northbound service (page 110).

I hope this cleared things up. Mvpo666 (talk) 15:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

@Mvpo666: No, it doesn't. The Chiltern Railways timetable that you link has the 23:18 ex-Aylesbury shown in light type after Amersham. This indicates a connecting service, not a through train (see first two Notes and symbols on p. 110). You therefore need to change trains at Amersham in order to reach Chalfont & Latimer at 23:51, etc. Similarly, the alleged 06:04 ex-Baker Street is shown in light type down to Chalfont & Latimer, so it's actually the 07:02 ex-Amersham.

I'm a bit puzzled how the 23:15 ex-Stratford upon Avon can depart Banbury 23:58, 13 minutes after a GW service, yet arrive Oxford 00:22 - five minutes before the GW service - unless the GW service gets looped at Wolvercot. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:09, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

It's a shame it's original research if one of us goes to Baker Street at 6am on Saturday to see if there's a Chiltern train there or not. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:50, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Got it. The WTT (section PA04) shows that the CR service from Stratford upon Avon (headcode 2V98) arrives Oxford at 00:22 - and the GW service from Banbury (2P99) departs from Oxford at 00:27, having arrived at 00:14. So although both are in Oxford together, they arrive in the same order that they departed Banbury.

The 23:18 ex-Aylesbury is in WTT section CG01, headcode 2C82, it definitely terminates at Amersham. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct! My mistake; I guess I didn't pay enough attention to the timetable. I apologise. Mvpo666 (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chiltern Railways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131016104132/http://www.railexpress.co.uk/news/chiltern-commences-birmingham-loco-hauled to http://www.railexpress.co.uk/news/chiltern-commences-birmingham-loco-hauled

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chiltern Railways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120302045142/http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/uploads/publications/1412.pdf to http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/uploads/publications/1412.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090828064814/http://www.chiltern-evergreen3.co.uk/ to http://www.chiltern-evergreen3.co.uk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091229050940/http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/downloads/29624.4/passenger-board-report-2008-2009.pdf to http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/downloads/29624.4/passenger-board-report-2008-2009.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090828064814/http://www.chiltern-evergreen3.co.uk/ to http://www.chiltern-evergreen3.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Citation needed for completion of Evergreen phase 2

The current citations (all three saying the same thing?) are only for contract award in 2010 – before any work began. But the text describes work completion. So ideally we should have a citation for actual handover. Can anyone supply (because I want to steal it for East West Rail). --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 09:05, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Map

I would love to see a good quality map in the article please GRALISTAIR (talk) 20:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

GRALISTAIR, there is a geographic map in the infobox, and a diagrammatic map just below it. What more are you after? -mattbuck (Talk) 22:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

My apologies I see it now. I should not use an iPhoneGRALISTAIR (talk) 22:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)