Talk:Charles Ollivierre

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Sahara4u in topic GA Review
Good articleCharles Ollivierre has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 28, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Charles Ollivierre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sahara4u (talk · contribs) 05:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Lede

edit
  • How did he represented the West Indies cricket team before they gained there Test status? You may link it to country.
  • "...becoming the first black West Indian to play for an English county." white West Indians had... played county cricket earlier?
  • Yes, although it is all quite odd. Pelham Warner, for instance, was technically a West Indian cricketer, and his brother captained the West Indies team. Also, other white West Indians played around this time in England, and one qualified for county cricket after the 1906 tour. Sarastro1 (talk) 15:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Early life and career

edit
  • ...went on to represent West Indies in first-class cricket. → "the" before west Indies
  • In other cricket, ... → What does this means?

West Indian tour of England in 1900

edit
  • ...several black cricketers on the team;... → in the team?
  • His highest score, and only century, ... → his only century in FC or in the series?

Derbyshire cricketer

edit
  • Against Essex, he made the highest score of his career,[5] when, according to his obituary in Wisden, "he was the dominating figure in a remarkable match". → Against Essex, he made the highest score of his career,[5] and according to his obituary in Wisden, "he was the dominating figure in a remarkable match".
  • "Essex scored 597 ......... 321 runs in the match." needs inline ref.

Good work with the article. Zia Khan 05:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Final review

edit
GA review (see Wikipedia:Good article criteria and WP:GACN)
  1. Well written.
    a (clear and concise prose which doesn't violate copyright laws, grammar and spelling are correct):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and fiction:  
  2. Factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (well-referenced):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (Wikipedia:No original research):  
  3. Broad in its coverage.
    a (covers major aspects):   b (well-focused):  
  4. Neutral .
    Fair representation, no bias:  
  5. Stable.
    No edit wars nor disputed contents:  
  6. Illustrated appropriately by images.
    a   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Result: No more issues, I guess. Good work, keep it up! Zia Khan 04:29, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Pass/Fail: