Talk:Castle Hill, Mere/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Dank in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 01:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Review.

  • "At the same time the village was expanded into a planned town, including with an unofficial market.": ... a planned town with an unofficial market.
  • "After Richard, his son Edmund inherited the property": I think I prefer "Richard's son Edmund inherited the property" - Dank (push to talk) 01:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • The toolbox gives 3 "not founds" for external links. Otherwise:
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Thanks Dank. I've updated the Parish Council links. The toolbox is suggesting that the gatehouse link is also broken, but this seems to be incorrect - clicking on the link appears to get through to the website correctly. Hchc2009 (talk) 07:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Passed. Everything checks out. - Dank (push to talk) 11:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply