Talk:Cascade Head

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Started article

This is a stub. I have more information that I will be posting in the near future.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaff (talk • contribs) 17:57, October 17, 2005

External links

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Do any of the external websites in the external links have pages relating specifically to Cascade Head? I'm unclear why the links have been included. Generally, per WP:EL, the external links should specifically address the subject of the article. And if any of these entities have jurisdiction over the place, they should be mentioned in the article and wikilinked, then the broader external links could be found on their respective pages. Katr67 (talk) 05:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Better yet, specific pages within them might be promoted to references, and eliminated from the external links section. —EncMstr 07:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reference removed

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed the bare-URL reference pointing to [1], along with the sentence that was cited as coming from there. I couldn't find anything to support the information at that site. [2] The user who added the material was permanently blocked some time ago, so I don't know about the quality of the addition. That reference was the trigger for the "bare URL" rag, so I took that off as well. Joyous! | Talk 20:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic