Talk:Carole Bayer Sager

Latest comment: 9 months ago by 2603:3010:79A:4000:441D:891F:9407:E608 in topic External links modified

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

2006

edit

How can we identify the subject to be a female in the first paragraph?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fdesroches (talk) 03:38, 21 November 2006‎

Selected songs section

edit

I think the "Selected songs" section should be organized not by singer, but in chronological order by song name, per other lists of songs by singers, writers, etc. I would have done it, but I don't know when each song was written. Tinlinkin 02:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

   No one has responded to this matter, raised a decade ago. I'm org'g alpha by title. Labeling any with "No date", "No date known", "Incomplete", etc. (reflecting mostly our failure to hunt down almost always available info, AND having the effect of discouraging readers from making the effort AND inviting the assumption that we think diligence is insufficient to determine the missing ones) would also disparage our readers' firm grasp of the obvious: they can see when we haven't included a date.
--Jerzyt 05:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
   Let's be perfectly clear: Nor i, nor you, own the section in question. Nevertheless, i'll probably back at it in days or a week; so if someone can't wait, go ahead.
   But it would be foolish to revert my work in favor of implementing a different approach, if you aren't prepared to finish before i get back to it, so consider working from the end backwards toward where i left off, and pinging me when you feel close to that point. That would put us both in a better position for an "intelligent discussion between gentle[folk]"; i can easily imagine that you'll have worked out a superior approach, and that i'd be willing to implement your model in the part i already messed up.
--Jerzyt 08:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
With all due respect, with the level of quality and quantity that Sager has produced, this really should be a linked article page all its own. On a separate note, a drive-by admin or editor who takes professional appearance on WP would have reverted this rather "thrown-together" list with its numerous punctuation errors, incomplete data, and in some cases contestable content, with the tag: needs significant clean-up. Regardless of the talk page or tag associated with the initial saved content. A WP article is not a draft in which to return and "work on". I highly recommend this to be reverted by its initial contributor, re-worked in keeping with other WP lists (leave out the superfluous: "Theme from ..." and "with connection to ..," etc. On first view, it looks very sloppy: "Theme from ..." -- sorted alphabetically by titles of the films in question." "Anyone at All" listed twice, and parenthetical incorrect usage, etc. IMHO. You're very lucky it wasn't rv'd Maineartists (talk) 11:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carole Bayer Sager. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Who was wife of James Taylor? 2603:3010:79A:4000:441D:891F:9407:E608 (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply