Talk:Carhenge

Untitled

There are other carhenges (for example at the end of The Secret Life of Machines, series 2, episode one "The Car" ); this article should be made generic rather than specific. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.171.199 (talk) 22:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Pagan ritual

I'm removing this section because it sounds completely asinine, has no citation, and is generally stupid. I can't think of any symbolic reason why any people or affiliation would do that, and furthermore the impracticality of it just makes it unfeasable. Until someone can come up with a VERY good reason why it should be kept, I'm deleting it.

why was it built?

Good question. Why was Stonehenge built, then? --haha169 (talk) 21:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

I think that before the Internet, parts of the Midwest could be very, very boring.....however that may be, the builder of this obviously had WAY too much time on his hands. Maybe a little more about the back ground to this in the article, local reaction, etc.?

I cannot believe in my eyes that someone thought that the fact the Stonehenge is made out of ehm.. stones needs to have a citation. And why noy put an inside link to the Stonehenge article, which clearly states that stonehenge is made out of stones? Nooo, we need a citation...

I am losing faith in humanity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.202.33.244 (talk) 04:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

File:A Yool Carhenge1 02Sep03 exif.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:A Yool Carhenge1 02Sep03 exif.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:A Yool Carhenge1 02Sep03 exif.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

It would, of course, have been nice to be notified on either my Wikipedia talkpage or my Wikimedia talkpage, but that would probably have been asking too much. Still, a useful lesson in how effort is valued at Wikipedia has been learned. --PLUMBAGO 07:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

File:A Yool Carhenge2 02Sep03 exif.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:A Yool Carhenge2 02Sep03 exif.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:A Yool Carhenge2 02Sep03 exif.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Alliance at night 030.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Alliance at night 030.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Alliance at night 030.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:19, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carhenge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090125133243/http://www.carhenge.com/history.htm to http://www.carhenge.com/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Difference between Stonehenge and Carhenge

Stonehenge and Carhenge are located nearly 10 degrees apart in latitude. The difference affects where the sun will rise and set on various days of the year, most notably the longest and shortest day. Was this considered when placing the cars? SlowJog (talk) 10:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)