Talk:Caracal/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs) 21:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Immediate problems
editCleanup banners
editThis article does not need or have many cleanup banners, such as {{clarifyme}}, {{citation needed}} and {{POW}} tags.
Plagiarism
editThis article does not plagiarise. The images are also properly licensed.
References
editThe references are perfect. All paragraphs are properly sourced.
Images
editThe images are relevant to the topic and they have suitable captions.
Well-written?
editThis article is well-written. It contains perfect prose. It has a lead section and proper layout. The spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization.
Original research
editThis article contains no original research.
Coverage
editThis article is broad in coverage and goes into detail only where necessary.
POV
editThis article has a neutral point of view.
Stability
editThis article is relatively stable. There has been no edit wars, but there has been quite a few undos in the history of the article due to vandalisms. However, these are not large-scale, so I can summarize that the stability is good enough for this article to be a good article.
Overview
editThis article is ready to be a good article.