Talk:Capacitor discharge ignition
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talk
editI looked at this page, hoping that I would find a typical schematic, but alas none.
Schematics are plentiful available on the net. But this page has some serious mistakes which need to be corrected —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.142.218.202 (talk) 10:03, August 23, 2007 (UTC)
Mistakes?
editBut this page has some serious mistakes which need to be corrected
I ask: What mistakes? --DaveDodgy (talk) 17:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
What are the disadvantages?
editThe heading called Advantages & Disadvantages of CDI only states the advantages, AFAICS. Any bad points of note about CDIs ? --DaveDodgy (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Potted or standard
editMy motorbike's CDI unit is by Shindengen. They potted the whole circuit in hard black rubber. I've been picking away at it, and nearly exposed the whole SMD circuit! Can someone add to the article the popularity of potting these types of circuits, vs just encasing them in a plastic or metal box ? Also, would overheating be a problem ? There are 10's of 1000's of these units made, how do they avoid it ? Heat conductive rubber? Overspec'd semiconductors, so they don't overheat, with ZERO airflow to cool them!? --DaveDodgy (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Open source as an alternative to expensive OEM CDIs
editThe circuit diagram for an open source CDI looks nice, but could it replace my current one? Will fuel efficiency go up/down? Will top speed go up/down ? Could it potentially damage the pulse sensor in my engine ?
Dead Link
editlink 1 in refrences is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.57.10.57 (talk) 23:05, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Removed another dead link — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.191.253.7 (talk) 11:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Capacitor discharge ignition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721074601/http://www.me.iitb.ac.in/~ems/dccdi.pdf to http://www.me.iitb.ac.in/~ems/dccdi.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)