Talk:Canoe and kayak diving

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Safety cover

edit

Although the paragraph concerning safety cover is written from a UK diving POV, it is still a consideration when using any small boat for diving. Removing this paragraph on the grounds of being UK-specific does nothing to improve the article. If the problem is lack of citation, then the whole article suffers from that and I've added a request for cites. --RexxS (talk) 00:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Citations about history and location of kayak diving around the world (almost none in the UK) inserted, and your safety section moved into an unreferenced unencyclopediac section. There are enough links at the bottom regarding the techniques to be looking at where you'll find little indication for the scaremongering paragraph of your choice. This is an encyclopedia -- it's supposed to describe how things are done, not how you personally would like them to be done. regards Goatchurch 10:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Not my safety section. It was there long before I arrived here (I saw it merely because it's scuba-related and hence on my watchlist). Nevertheless, I believe the concerns about leaving a "dead boat" are real and verifiable. I've added a reference to one such incident. I'll look through my small-boat safety literature later to find some advice about leaving safety cover on the surface. We work to improve articles, not impose our POV on them. So find some reliable sources that show what's there to be "scaremongering" and we can re-write the paragraph to present each view in a neutral manner. As it seems you're interested in this subject, perhaps you could help improve the article by reading WP:NOTGUIDE and try to re-write Kayak diving#Technique so that it looks more like an encyclopedia article and less like an instruction manual. It would help also if you could find some reliable sources that describe techniques of course. Hope that helps --RexxS (talk) 17:55, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Original research

edit

The policy on original research is summarised thus:

Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position not clearly advanced by the sources.

The section Safety issues has been tagged with concerns about OR, but there is no indication of the material which is not "attributable to a reliable, published source" or which "contain .. new analysis or synthesis of published material". That section simply relates the views of independent sources on the safety issues of leaving an unattended boat while diving. A kayak is a boat, like any other, and the safety concerns apply equally. I'll remove the boldly placed OR tag and await further discussion here. --RexxS (talk) 16:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merged

edit

As discussed on the old Talk:Canoe diving page. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 16:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Canoe and Kayak diving. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply