Talk:California Graduate Institute
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis reads like a brochure from the institute in question.129.67.109.195 (talk) 11:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
What has been presented here are the literal facts on the California Graduate University.—Preceding unsigned comment added by PsychD11 (talk • contribs) 23:03, May 15, 2008
I have to agree with the first poster - this article does read like a brochure: "Our institutional mission...", "Our students..." etc. StripeyBadger (talk) 07:29, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
It is a fact that CGI never posted or requested this site to be posted. There have been many new developments with CGI as far as accredidation, etc. Hopefully, they will be posted very soon to remove any question mark that anyone may have about the school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PsychD11 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:California Graduate Institute/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Please discontinue putting up incorrect information. If you want to post, please contact the school and discuss the matter. |
Last edited at 17:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 10:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on California Graduate Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090213090437/http://thechicagoschool.edu/content.cfm/detailed_news?NewsID=502940 to http://www.thechicagoschool.edu/content.cfm/detailed_news?NewsID=502940
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.ladowntownnews.com/articles/2008/10/27/news/10-27-08-news06.txt - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080709045434/http://www.psychboard.ca.gov/applicants/license.shtml to http://www.psychboard.ca.gov/applicants/license.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070307143353/http://www.bbs.ca.gov/licstat4.htm to http://www.bbs.ca.gov/licstat4.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070528072855/http://www.cgi.edu/welcome/history.html to http://www.cgi.edu/welcome/history.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929014724/http://www.cpapsych.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=18 to http://www.cpapsych.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=18
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080208020652/http://nationalpsychologist.com/articles/art3992.htm to http://www.nationalpsychologist.com/articles/art3992.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleting External Link
editHello fellow wikipeidans, I just deleted the external link as it appeared to link to a scam site. I am not aware of the legitimate website this page should link too. If anyone has any additional information it would be helpful. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinopt (talk • contribs) 23:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)