Talk:Calais Conference (July 1915)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by RoySmith in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Calais Conference (July 1915) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 November 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 02:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that confusion at the Calais Conference of July 1915 meant that both the British and French thought they had persuaded the other to support their opposing war strategies? Source: "This first meeting was so badly organised that no secretary was present to record its conclusion and the result was that the French believed that the British had agreed to a major offensive on the Western Front in the summer whilst the British believed that the French had agreed that Britain should make her main effort at the Dardanelles" from: Smith, Paul (15 July 2010). Government and Armed Forces in Britain, 1856-1990. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 101. ISBN 978-0-8264-1894-4.
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 14:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC).
New article that was moved to mainspace on 24 October 2022 is 3,905 characters and nominated on the same day. No copyvios detected (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 170 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Ref 6 (verifying the hook) is a reliable source. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 21:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
