Talk:Brigade insignia of the United States Army

158th MEB SSI

158th MEB's SSI and info can be seen at http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/Heraldry/ArmyDUISSICOA/ArmyHeraldryUnit.aspx?u=7594, if someone could locate a .svg of the SSI and upload it would be helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.208.243 (talk) 18:57, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done --Trilotat (talk) 19:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Support Brigade section

McChizzle deleted the links to Support Brigades (401st through 411th) at Brigade insignia of the United States Army with comment, "According to TIOH, all of these support brigades were canceled by HQDA G-1 directives on 21 February 2010." The TIOH page for those brigades' heraldry reflects that point, but would it be appropriate to display these insignia for historical representation? Separately, 916th Support Brigade still exists (at Fort Irwin), so that insignia (here) merits representation in the Support Brigade section.--Trilotat (talk) 16:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

The page appears to have SSIs that are still in use by the US Army. If we want to also put historical brigade SSIs on this page, we have a heck of a lot of work to do. If the 916th is still active, it should be added to the page regardless of what we decide to do about the historical SSIs. --McChizzle (talk) 13:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Agreed; perhaps adding historical SSIs is beyond the purview of this particular article. I added the 916th's SSI. --Trilotat (talk) 00:46, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brigade insignia of the United States Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060427133645/http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/DUI_SSI_COA_page.htm to http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/DUI_SSI_COA_page.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Why are CSIBs better than SSI?

@Illegitimate Barrister: I see you've replaced some Shoulder Sleeve Insignia (SSI) with Combat Service Identification Badges (CSIBs). Why is one better than the other? Trilotat (talk) 16:30, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• 111th MI BDE Patch.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Insignia of the 11th Signal Brigade (Desert Thunderbirds).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)