Talk:Brandon Scoop B Robinson

Agree with Ronz

This appears to be a lot of marketing/self promotion by the individual themselves. And as Ronz says, the editing patterns are fishy. Not to mention, it's questionable whether the person passes the tests for being on wikipedia. normally this is reserved for more established members of the media and authors. -- Sept 18, 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.2.100 (talk)

Made Some Edits

Made some edits a while back on Robinson. On the indie scene he seemed well respected. He's grown since making headlines with his reporting over the last year. He is surely, notable. Advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean luc harrington (talk • contribs) 00:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Too much like a resume

If there's anything written about him with depth and context, the article should be rewritten from them. Right now the article looks like an extension of various public relations campaigns for him, which is no surprise given the extensive amount of WP:SPA editing. --Ronz (talk) 03:36, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

So, is there anything written about him with depth and context, other than clearly promotional material? --Hipal (talk) 01:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks everyone for the cleanup over the past year.

I'm still concerned that this is a resume rather than an encyclopedia article. Glancing at the first 10 refs, overall they appear poor and promotional. --Hipal (talk) 20:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

I remove the tag

I purposely remove the tag, because I removed deadlinks & possible pro Shawoniakr (talk) 11:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

I've restored it for the reasons given directly above. --Hipal (talk) 16:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)