Talk:Bramhall High School
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
...well the school is notable. Tell us more? Some pics? What about the school? History? Victuallers 21:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'll do some research.. Majorly (talk) 21:53, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
NPOV
editI just reverted for the second time an edit changing a good portion of the article. My concern is that the edits violate the neutral point of view policy, in that they form an opinion with regard to the school. Specific examples of pov in the recent additions, the opening sentence to one recently added paragraph reads "These ongoing and damaging controversies are typical of a school with a long history of the introduction of madcap schemes by modernist teaching managers who have been seeking to make a name for themselves in the borough." All in caps at the end is the note "COULD DO BETTER - HOPE TO SEE IMPROVEMENT NEXT YEAR." My strong feeling is that this is not written from a neutral point of view. Thoughts? --TeaDrinker 00:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. The recent edits are clearly pov vandalism, but the whole article was previously full of unsourced criticism and commentary - probably by the same vandal. I think it should be stubbed to what can be reliably sourced. -- zzuuzz(talk) 00:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies if I breached any protocols in previous edits I made. There was no intention to vandalise or otherwise damage the article. The school has a well publicised history of unpopular policy making, and financial controversy. I have removed the comments mentioned by teadrinker, above, and hope that this will suffice. bluetuliproseread
- No need to apologize, but I still have some concerns much of the article is editorializing. I took the liberty of cutting two paragraphs of unattributed text, as well as a fair amount of material which appeared to be written with a specific point of view. I still have some concerns that the article gives undue weight to criticism, but I don't have the means to fix it this evening. I apologize if this editing appears abrupt--I don't mean it as an attack on your writing personally--but I think the article needs some improvement. Thanks for the work and continued discussion. --TeaDrinker 08:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bramhall High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225180218/http://www.edubase.gov.uk:80/establishment/summary.xhtml?urn=106139 to http://www.edubase.gov.uk/establishment/summary.xhtml?urn=106139
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bramhall High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to https://www.bramhallhigh.stockport.sch.uk/user/59/233112.docx - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206070317/http://www.rfu.com/SquadsAndPlayers/WomensRugby/HarrietMillar-Mills.aspx to http://www.rfu.com/SquadsAndPlayers/WomensRugby/HarrietMillar-Mills.aspx
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.edubase.gov.uk/establishment/summary.xhtml?urn=106139
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)