 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to Bomb (magazine). Favonian (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
BOMB (magazine) → Bomb (magazine) – Upper- and lowercase per official site's own copyright indicia. Consistent with Time (magazine), Cosmopolitan (magazine), etc., which also do all caps on their covers. This magazine's owners I'm sure want their name in all-caps, but half the magazines in the world are all caps on the cover and we don't do all caps in article names. No reason this should be any different than Time, Cosmopolitan, etc. Tenebrae (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support the WP:MOSTM is the relevant guideline here.--70.24.208.34 (talk) 23:03, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Clear MOS:TM case. Jenks24 (talk) 04:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support. WP:MOSTM is pretty clear-cut on cases like this. --DAJF (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
NOTE: An admin would have to make this change, since an attempted redirect to Bomb (magazine) before this discussion began resulted in a "can't do it" screen. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Did move
editI don't know if the above requested move was done and then undone without discussion, or if it was never done... but I went ahead and did it, both since it meets our guidelines for article naming and because it was the clear result of the above discussion. I also undid the all-capsing of the title within the article, per MOS:ALLCAPS --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- I now see that the page had been moved, and then was moved back at the request of User:Savannnahbomb, an SPA on the topic of Bomb, That the non-all-caps formatting is used by independent reliable sources and thus qualifies for our use can be seen in this example. Said user had incorrectly claimed that the move was non-controversial, which given the existing discussed consensus was clearly not the case. --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)