Talk:Bodice

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Wordreader in topic Bodice vs pair of bodies.

Untitled

edit
--PKM 02:55, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bodice definition needs fixing.

edit

The definition of bodice,

A bodice is an article of clothing for women, covering the body from the neck to the waist

does not match the two illustrations provided. Neither bodice goes anywhere near the neck.

--174.16.19.14 (talk) 10:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

There's a disconnect between the historical useage of the term, which matches the first sentences of the description, and the current SCA/RenFaire-esque use for the vaguely corsetlike item shown in the images. Could be made clearer. - JRBrown (talk) 19:45, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. I just read the article, and I'm still not clear what a bodice is. Boneyard90 (talk) 22:37, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bodice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bust bodice

edit

The redirects Bust bodice and Bust Bodice, which currently target the bra article, have been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 September 15#Bust bodice. Input from editors with knowledge of this subject area would be most welcome in the linked discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 10:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bodice vs pair of bodies.

edit

Greetings - I came to Wikipedia to get information on "bodies" (two halves, a right and a left, make one garment, hence the term "pair of bodies"). But was re-directed to this article. The bodies were a precursor to the pair of stays which was, in turn, the precursor to the corset, but this article implies that "bodice" means "bodies", which I did not know.

Nearly all dresses have a bodice, a structure that runs roughly from the shoulder to the waist, depending on cut and style, and can encase a woman's torso. The purpose of the bodies was to support a woman's breasts, I believe, but I don't think they totally encased the torso; they probably left the upper chest wall and upper back free, save for possible straps. This article seems kind of mashed together and is muddy about the differences and purposes of bodies vs bodice. I want to know what bodies looked like, how they differed from stays, and when they were in style (15th? 16th? centuries). If you have this knowledge, please sharpen up the article and provide the information. Pictures would be a big help, if possible.

In your comments on lacing, you left out "ladder lacing". Example: A woman named Morgan Donner, who does historical sewing, used ladder lacing on this garment - http://www.morgandonner.com/2017/06/laurel-gown/

Thank you for your anticipated help, Wordreader (talk) 06:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

PS: Here are a pair of stays - https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/File:A_pair_of_stays.JPG - Thanks again, Wordreader (talk) 06:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply