Talk:Blue Swallow (film)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Blue Swallow → Blue Swallow (film) — and Blue Swallow (bird) → Blue Swallow — I think people might reasonably expect Blue Swallow to be an article about the bird rather than the film. PC78 19:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in support of the move

1. Support per nom. --Yath 02:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
2. Support as per nomination. The new name will also fall under the standards used for other films in Wikipedia. --Kimon^talk 13:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

   This would be a fine title if it didn't conflict with anything else. Dekimasuよ! 02:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

3. Support I think species takes priority over an obscure film. 205.157.110.11 01:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
4. Support. The bird appears to be a more common search term than the film, particularly since the English title is a recent translation of the Korean one. Dekimasuよ! 02:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Survey - in opposition to the move

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

This article has been renamed from Blue Swallow to Blue Swallow (film) as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 20:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Blue Swallow movie poster.jpg

Image:Blue Swallow movie poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)