Talk:Bingham Baring, 2nd Baron Ashburton

Proposed merge with Louisa Caroline Stewart-Mackenzie

Seems to mainly notable due to relationships to other notable people, but notability WP:NOTINHERITED. I had proposed a merge to Harriet Hosmer, but that was mostly due to the POV of the Louisa Caroline Stewart-Mackenzie article. Verbcatcher proposed merging to Bingham Baring, 2nd Baron Ashburton, and I agree that makes more sense. GretLomborg (talk) 18:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Oppose merge, she has adequate notability on her own, and in this case, having multiple relationships with notable people itself may actually defeat NOTINHERITED. It would be rather ridiculous to redirect an article about a probable lesbian to that of a husband that she was only married to for less than a decade. Montanabw^(talk) 23:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Oppose merge if she is notable enough to have a stand alone biography in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography [1] (subscription needed) why would we question that she isn't independently notable? SusunW (talk) 00:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Oppose merge, mainly based on ODNB article and her having a notable art collection (which is close to being a notable art collector). We should probably follow the ODNB's lead and rename the article to Louisa Caroline Baring, unless we can find a source to establish that she used her maiden name after her husband died. It seems she was usually known as Lady Ashburton, but that article title would probably need disambiguation. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Comment: I agree on the renaming. All the sources I found called her Lady Ashburton. I found none that referred to her as Stewart-Mackenzie. SusunW (talk) 23:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Oppose merge, based upon recent improvements and comments above.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Oppose, her article is a fine stand-alone piece. Carptrash (talk) 00:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

I have moved the article to Louisa Baring, Lady Ashburton, based on WP:NCBRITPEER and a brief discussion on the article's talk page. I hope that this dose not cause problems. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Close proposal - GretLomborg, Do you think we can close this out now, since 1) the votes oppose the merger and 2) there has been significant work on the article?–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:28, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

sure - GretLomborg (talk) 19:00, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Great, thanks! Done.–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bingham Baring, 2nd Baron Ashburton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140715021148/http://www.artflakes.com/en/products/portrait-of-lady-ashburton to http://www.artflakes.com/en/products/portrait-of-lady-ashburton

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)