Talk:Bill Thompson (New York politician)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Protection request

edit

{{editsemiprotected}}

  Not done: The {{editsemiprotected}} template is used by non-autoconfirmed editors to allow them to insert changes into semiprotected pages, not to request page protection. To request page protection, you need to go to Wikipedia:Request for page protection and follow the directions. An admin will then have a look and decide if protection is needed. I'm not an admin, but I'd expect that request would be denied. You can read the criteria over at Wikipedia:Request for page protection, but generally there needs to be a high level of vandalism or other disruption by non-autoconfirmed users. Good Luck, Celestra (talk) 23:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

NPOV - Early Life and Career & Political Career

edit

This article seems to be missing a few key components of Thompson's career. Why is there no mention of the pension investigation? His failures as head of the Department of Education? Or the fact that since he's become City Comptroller his department has done far fewer audits than his predecessors? Please see: http://www.citylimits.org/content/articles/viewarticle.cfm?article_id=3770&content_type=1&media_type=3

7/19/09 BadGrammarMakesMeSic (talk) 21:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agree that the article reads like campaign material and that some editors seem intent on keeping it so. Cloonmore (talk) 02:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Responsibility of investing retirement assets"

edit

The article makes the claim that, "As chief investment adviser to the city’s five pension funds, Thompson has the responsibility of investing the retirement assets of approximately 640,000 people." The source cited, The Bureau of Intergovernmental Relations, does not support the claim. Moreover, the NYCERS website states clearly that the Board of Trustees, of which Thompson is but one member, has the responsibility of investing assets of the retirement system. Therefore, I'm deleting that sentence from the article until someone can come up with support for it or clarification. Cloonmore (talk) 03:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive editing/Vandalism

edit

A good deal of the recent edits by anonymous users consists of removing tags without comment, removing any remotely negative information about Thompson, inserting meaningless cites in place of "citations needed" tags, reintroducing inaccurate information identified as such on this Talk page, as well as altering Talk page comments by other users, all of which constitute disruptive editing or vandalism. If such conduct continues, I think the article should get semi-protection. Cloonmore (talk) 02:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Presumptive nominee"

edit

There is no source or basis for calling Thompson the "presumptive" Democratic nominee. There's at least one other candidate -- Tony Avella. Anything can happen. Until he gets the nomination, there's no presumption for or against him.Cloonmore (talk) 01:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also, "presumptive nominee" seems to have a specific meaning. If a candidate has won enough votes for a nomination but the nominating convention hasn't yet taken place, the candidate is a "presumptive nominee" during the interim period. Even if Bill Thompson were the only candidate, I don't think he would be the "presumptive nominee" until after the primary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.42.126.245 (talk) 12:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dinkins endorsement

edit

Dinkins' is the very first endorsement listed on the candidate's own campaign webpage. Therefore, it stays here. Cloonmore (talk) 01:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Closer than expected race"

edit

The article claims that NBC News "indicated the mayoral race may be a lot closer than many have expected despite Bloomberg's wealth." The source cited in support of this claim nowhere indicates any such thing. Therefore, the assertion has been removed. Cloonmore (talk) 01:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Photo caption

edit

There's no evidence that the two women to whom Thompson is chatting in the first photo are "supporters." Obviously, from the appearance of signs in the background, Thompson is in campaign mode in the picture. Therefore, the caption should reflect that apparent fact and nothing more. Cloonmore (talk) 01:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

HA HA AND SEE WHAT HAPPENED? IDIOTS LISTENED TO THE POLLS TO TELL THEM THE OUTCOME INSTEAD OF DECIDING FOR THEMSELVES. WHOEVER POSTED IT HAD SOME SENSE UNLIKE HALF OF NEW YORK. I WISH THIS GUY WAS MAYOR INSTEAD OF BLOOMJERK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.201.128.234 (talk) 04:16, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Leading Democratic Candidate

edit

Please stop trying to hide the fact that Bill Thompson is the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination for New York City mayor by placing this information, the most important information of Thompson's political career at the end of the first paragraph when it should be placed in the first sentence and before the Working Families Party endorsement. --64.241.148.82 (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

This isn't a campaign article. It's a biography. What the subject is (Comptroller), and not what he wishes to be (Mayor), is the most important point and, therefore, the lede. It comes first. Reference to his candidacy would logically follow. Cloonmore (talk) 01:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Photo Caption (RE)

edit

It is complete fact that the women in the photo are supporters because this photograph was taken at a campaign event, Bill's campaign kickoff, at which all attendees were supporters. Please stop changing the caption. --64.241.148.82 (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

You have provided no basis that it's a "complete fact." Just because someone may wander into Thompson's outdoor campaign event and he shakes her hand doesn't mean she's not an Avella or Bloomberg supporter or an undecided. Cloonmore (talk) 01:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

NPOV

edit

There is no reason cited for why the neutrality of this article is disputed, therefore I removed the template.--64.241.148.82 (talk) 14:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bill Thompson (New York politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bill Thompson (New York politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bill Thompson (New York politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply