Talk:Bill Archer
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bill Archer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biography assessment rating comment
editThe article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 22:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Ron Paul and Reagan.jpg
edit
Image:Ron Paul and Reagan.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Rice affiliation
editArcher did not graduate from Rice U. Why is he classified here as an alum?
Requested move 11 July 2018
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved as proposed. bd2412 T 01:05, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
William Reynolds Archer Jr. → Bill Archer – "Bill" is the most WP:COMMONNAME; most national media certainly did not use his full name.
- The Vanderbilt Television News Archive [1] has 94 results for "Bill Archer" dating back to his early congressional career in the early 1970s.
- A story from the Houston Chronicle last year: "Ex Houston Congressman Bill Archer testifies for GOP tax reform plan."
- C-SPAN has consistently used "Bill Archer" in its on-screen tags of Archer dating back to 1985 - see the "Appearance Stats" section of this link.
- The Washington Post generally used "Bill Archer", such as in this 1997 story "Bill Archer's tough target" and in this 1992 story "Bush's unlikely family man"; Google returns over 300 results for "Bill Archer" site:washingtonpost.com but only two for "Rep. William Archer" site:washingtonpost.com
- The official US Congress database has an entry titled Bill Archer. Arbor to SJ (talk) 04:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment. Well, obviously can't be moved to Bill Archer as that's a redirect to a disambiguation page. Bill Archer (politician) maybe? As long as none of the other politicians at William Archer are known as Bill. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:43, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Bill Archer page has zero incoming links, so there won't be any issues with moving this article there. Also, the politician will be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, because Bill Archer (businessman) does not have as much notability. Arbor to SJ (talk) 16:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Bill Archer has no incoming links because incoming links to dab pages (and their redirects) are routinely cleaned up. Is it certain that none of the other William Archers are known as "Bill"? Dekimasuよ! 08:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Besides Bill Archer (businessman), none of the other William Archers are commonly known as Bill, especially those who lived before the 20th century. Arbor to SJ (talk) 05:39, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- User:Necrothesp, do you disagree that the politician is the primary topic for "Bill Archer"? Dekimasuよ! 18:30, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- ...In the absence of any response here, support. Dekimasuよ! 23:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Besides Bill Archer (businessman), none of the other William Archers are commonly known as Bill, especially those who lived before the 20th century. Arbor to SJ (talk) 05:39, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Bill Archer has no incoming links because incoming links to dab pages (and their redirects) are routinely cleaned up. Is it certain that none of the other William Archers are known as "Bill"? Dekimasuよ! 08:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Bill Archer page has zero incoming links, so there won't be any issues with moving this article there. Also, the politician will be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, because Bill Archer (businessman) does not have as much notability. Arbor to SJ (talk) 16:13, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support move to Bill Archer, per nom. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.