Talk:Bhikhu Parekh

Baron Parekh

Is Lord his first name? RickK 22:58, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)

Requested move 1

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Speedily closed by BrownHairedGirl and withdrawn by the nominator.  — Amakuru (talk) 17:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

---

Bhikhu Parekh → Bhikhu Parekh, Baron Parekh.

Oppose - Known for being an academic and not as a peer. Also no disambiguation is required for this article title.--Lucy-marie (talk) 18:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Support. WP:NCPEER is quite clear. This chap is no longer wholly or exclusively known by his pre-peerage nomenclature. Kittybrewster ☎ 15:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

• Speedy close. Article was created nearly 3 years ago as Bhikhu Parekh, Baron Parekh, and was stable at that title until moved by the nominator. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Comment - Just because a move request is in itself contenious dosen't make the origianl undiscussed move title correct. All moves need discussing and this discussion needs to be had to alllowed to establish if it is the concensus title.--Lucy-marie (talk) 22:46, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Lucy-marie, please check the page history and/or read what I wrote: it was you who did the undiscussed move. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

I see you have just struck the word "move" in your claim that there was an "undiscussed move".

You still don't seem to understand what happened: you moved a page, and then opened an RM to see there was a consensus to move it back to its title before you moved it. That's wrong: if you want a discussion on a page title, don't try to pre-empt that discussion by moving the page to your preferred title before opening the discussion.

The article is now back at its stable title, so this move request is redundant and should be closed. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:01, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Withdrawn - Please close and see new discussion below.--Lucy-marie (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved to Bhikhu Parekh. The person is almost exclusively known by his personal name. --rgpk (comment) 21:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Bhikhu Parekh, Baron Parekh → Bhikhu Parekh.

Support - Known for being an academic and not as a peer. Also no disambiguation is required for this article title.--Lucy-marie (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy close. Wait for one RM to be closed before opening another. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Strike speedy close, now that prev discussion is closed. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

• Oppose. He has been a peer for 11 years, which encompasses most of his period of notability. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• Support, in spite of having been a peer for 11 years, he still writes under the name Bhikhu Parekh (see e.g. here).--Kotniski (talk) 12:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bhikhu Parekh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613173042/http://www.bombaybar.com:80/lectures/justice_kt_desai_memorial_lecture_2009_lord_bhikhu_parekh.php to http://www.bombaybar.com/lectures/justice_kt_desai_memorial_lecture_2009_lord_bhikhu_parekh.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101201225051/http://westminster.ac.uk/schools/humanities/politics-and-international-relations/people to http://www.westminster.ac.uk/schools/humanities/politics-and-international-relations/people
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606070922/http://www.britac.ac.uk/fellowship/elections/2003/parekh_b.cfm to http://www.britac.ac.uk/fellowship/elections/2003/parekh_b.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)