Talk:Bernie

Latest comment: 5 years ago by FelixtheMagnificent in topic Bernie Sanders - c'mon!

Requested move 14 December 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 12:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply


BernieBernie (disambiguation)WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT Bernie Sanders has the most page views and he is often known just as "Bernie". Bernie Mac is the only oher contender in this respect, but for short he is usually referred to as just "Mac", as opposed to Bernie.--Prisencolin (talk) 02:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I meant in WP:RS, books. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Bernie Sanders - c'mon!

edit

He should be on the page. Why don't I make the edit? I'm not interested in drama. And I'm pretty certain it would be "controversial" for some.

AllThatJazz2012 (talk) 07:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Given names have their own page. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
And exceptions are made where persons are commonly known mononymously (although to be fair, the current Bernie Sanders article doesn't establish this). olderwiser 11:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Revisiting this after a year, there are particularly high pageview statistics to Bernie Sanders, so it makes sense to add one exception to list this article beneath the "Bernie (given name)" entry. Other search methods (e.g. Google Images) re-affirm that there is a good chance that anyone searching "Bernie" is looking for Bernie Sanders, despite not being known mononymously as "Bernie". +mt 01:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
A "good chance" does not justify adding him here. Bernie Madoff also has very high name recognition, and if you're more sports-minded, Bernie Williams, Bernie Kosar and (for Canadians) Bernie Parent are all quite well-known. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:45, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Adding a few others to a view of pageview statistics (and modifying the axes), views to Bernie Sanders generally exceed most others by a decent margin. I'm not too bothered whether a few notable names are nested in this disambiguation article or not (e.g. see Hilary), but just pointing out there is pretty good evidence to suggest which "Bernie" folks are looking for, and would support this as an exception. +mt 20:38, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Note the overwhelming verdict of the section above. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
That's a different discussion (which I would oppose). I'm only pointing out pretty good evidence to support an exception to add one person to this disambiguation article, nothing more. +mt 19:59, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
How is that discussion not relevant? If Sanders doesn't qualify as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, he doesn't qualify to be here. Lincoln, yes. Einstein, yes. Bernie, no. There are just too many other prominent Bernies. Also, I've removed Clinton and Edmund (and a couple of other inappropriate entries) from Hilary. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:43, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
New year, new issues:
I was hoping to lazily wiki “Bernie” and at least see the damn man listed on the page somewhere to click on. He wasn’t listed. Thank you, guys – I thought we were supposed to be a public service? Who the heck doesn’t associate “Bernie” with Mr. Bernie Sanders? The man is larger than US internal politics—it’s a disservice that he’s not listed here! I would add him under the ‘be bold’ principle, but I’m sure it’d just get reverted.
Senator Sanders is notable enough to be listed in this page listing stuff; what kind of right-wing infiltration is opposing this…? You’re opposing informing/educating the populace. Thank you! FelixtheMagnificent (talk) 14:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

And I won't stand for that. When someone nearly becomes a general election American presidential canditate, they need to be recognized for that, instead of childishly ignored. I'm even willing to get banned over this. That's completely wrong to snub such a major figure in American politcs due to ones own political prejudices.

comment added by Emandudeguyperson (talkcontribs) 18:34, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

See previous discussion (the one just before this). The Bernie Sanders article doesn't demonstrate that "Bernie" is an mononymous name for Bernie Sanders. +mt 00:43, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply