Talk:Bernice Blackstock
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image copyright problem with File:NICOLACARLOSBERNICE.jpg
editThe image File:NICOLACARLOSBERNICE.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Blackstock
editI'm pretty sure this is her WP:COMMONNAME, especially since she is no longer married to Ashley. She's also called Blackstock in the media and in the closing credits. Would anyone object to the page being moved back to Blackstock? - JuneGloom Talk 23:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I see she's still listed as Thomas, but I would definitely support the above move. Blackstock was the name she was introduced under and she's now been known by that name for the last two and a half years. Smurfmeister (talk) 15:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
I personallythink the article should be moved back to Blackstock,I even forgot she was a Thomas at one stage — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.66.201.10 (talk) 11:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Since this has been open for over a year, I'm going to ask an admin to move the page back to Blackstock. - JuneGloom07 Talk 15:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- I've moved it. anemoneprojectors 00:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bernice Blackstock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6Lj0ifLYN?url=http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/feature/a7412/british-soap-awards-2002-nominations.html to http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/feature/a7412/british-soap-awards-2002-nominations.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)