 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 October 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability tag
editWikidea, can you help establish that it meets WP:NOTABILITY? Boleyn (talk) 15:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- It's not the most fascinating, or pathbreaking case - but it is notable per se as being a case in the Court of Appeal (always a precedent) and in the High Court it's done something unusual (by saying director fees were excessive). I'll add a reference where an academic article referred to it. Sorry to take long to reply, cheers, Wikidea 13:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)