Talk:Baxter Building

Heading text

Ultimate FF - Van Damme vs. Von Doom; I'm not sure if his name changes later, but he is called Victor Van Damme during the relevant portion of this comic in the Baxter Building. Lupusrex 20:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

New cartoon

I've removed the bit that says "The Fantasic Four are a nusance to Courtny the landlord", because everything I've read about the series suggests Courtney's just a neighbour, but I've not actually seen the show, so ICBW. Daibhid C 20:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

C-Class rated for Comics Project

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

New movie

The State Office Building, on the corner of 3rd Street at Convention Street in Baton Rouge, is being used as the Baxter building for the new Fantastic Four film (It says "Baxter Institute" on the front, where it normally says "State Office Building") — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.75.109.65 (talk) 22:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Baxter Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120225173508/http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/24070 to http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/24070
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110817003614/http://www.comingsoon.net/news/interviewsnews.php?id=20500 to http://www2.comingsoon.net/news/interviewsnews.php?id=20500
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101009022041/http://skyride.com/doc/high/walking.pdf to http://www.skyride.com/doc/high/walking.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

So do we cover Dr. Strange ref or not?

• Pro This article already covers other aspects of the Baxter Building, including alternative timelines and histories. Also, Baxter Foundation already redirected to here, so seems like as good a place to cover it as any.
• Con The foundation is apparently an organization, no building is mentioned in the film. The mention amounts to an Easter Egg only.

Personally, I don't have strong feelings one way or another, which is why I haven't weighed in, but the movie is in theaters now, and people are putting it in and taking it out, so we probably should actually discuss whether to cover it or not. Jclemens (talk) 23:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)