Talk:Basso profondo

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 2601:243:1F00:4A40:D902:9250:46F3:1A8C in topic Relevance of the "in popular culture" paragraph


Merge with oktavist

edit

Added template proposing merger of "Oktavist" into "Basso profondo", as previously discussed here. These are alternate terms for the same vocal range.Bcharles (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

This proposal was discussed here and continued here. I will move ahead with the merge, with the goal of keeping relevant info about oktavists in a subesction of basso profondo and redirecting oktavist to basso profondo.Bcharles (talk) 10:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Basso profondo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Basso profondo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Tim Storms

edit

The sentence regarding Tim Storms' Guinness record should be removed as it is not relevant to the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:8B16:2D01:656E:5428:1667:6E97 (talk) 11:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

See A Mad & Faithful Telling

edit

It says "For the DeVotchKa song, see A Mad & Faithful Telling." How does this song relate to bass profondo?" I looked over the article of the song and nothing relates to this article. I will remove that since it's not relevant. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 01:09, 18 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Potential edit warring on the voice types articles

edit

Talk:Bass_(voice_type)#Potential edit warring on the voice types articles Kuulopuhe (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

the singers mentioned there are indeed fairly well-known and do occasionally sing in the typical range of a basso profondo, but none of them are actual profundi. The mentioning of subharmonic singing is done poorly and can be made more relevant. Also, the redirect from "subharmonics" to "undertone series" is questionable. I would just delete the last paragraph 2601:243:1F00:4A40:D902:9250:46F3:1A8C (talk) 18:32, 28 June 2024 (UTC)Reply