Talk:Bahrain Grand Prix
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bahrain Grand Prix article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name Change?
editShouldn't this page be at Bahraini Grand Prix. We do not have Turkey Grand Prix or Australia Grand Prix.--Greasysteve13 02:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Bahrain is the correct term to use. Andreasu 14:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Okay. Should we note that it is inconsistant then?--Greasysteve13 07:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Same story with the Monaco Grand Prix, it isn't called the Monégasque Grand Prix or United States Grand Prix instead of American Grand Prix. Yes you do have a good point of that metioning it should be named as he "nationalilty" words, but it isn't as the FIA calls them different. Andreasu 23:15, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Okay. Should we note that it is inconsistant then?--Greasysteve13 07:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Lap Record
editDon't you think it would be suitable to include the lap record of this track on the right hand side? (I don't know it myself) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.30.95.205 (talk) 07:23, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Lap record belongs essentially to the circuit rather than the race, and can be found at Bahrain International Circuit. --Falcadore (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
New Layout
editPerhaps we could have a picture of the old layout to compare with the new one? --MooBaloo (talk) 17:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
The layout for 2011 has reverted to the 2009 configuration [1]. Should the picture be reverted, or a new one created to show this? Goetzathome (talk) 11:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Links
edit>> Bahrain activists urge boycott of F1 race Lihaas (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bahrain Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423015835/http://www.fia.com:80/en-GB/mediacentre/pressreleases/f1releases/2012/Pages/f1-preview-bhn.aspx to http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/pressreleases/f1releases/2012/Pages/f1-preview-bhn.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120424061406/http://www.zdnet.com:80/blog/security/anonymous-hacks-formula-1/11661 to https://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/anonymous-hacks-formula-1/11661
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:36, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bahrain Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/pressreleases/f1releases/2012/Pages/f1-preview-bhn.aspx
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.zdnet.com/blog/security/anonymous-hacks-formula-1/11661
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040329112501/http://www.bahraingp.com.bh/ to http://www.bahraingp.com.bh/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Repeat winners (engine manufacturers)
editWhich flag for Honda RBPT? GBR, AUT or JPN? @DH85868993: Island92 (talk) 17:58, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think it should be JPN since RBPT has little to do with the power units. They are also made in Japan, as confirmed by this source: "Watanabe underlined Honda's commitment to Red Bull until the end of the 2025 season and confirmed the majority of the production of the current power unit, which will now be called a Honda-RBPT, would continue to be carried out in Japan." Carfan568 (talk) 01:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Should the engine manufacturers even have flags? See this discussion from 2020. DH85868993 (talk) 05:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, they should. Consistency with other tables for the section "Winners". Island92 (talk) 10:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Let's go for JPN. Island92 (talk) 10:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, they should. Consistency with other tables for the section "Winners". Island92 (talk) 10:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Should the engine manufacturers even have flags? See this discussion from 2020. DH85868993 (talk) 05:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)