Untitled

edit

To agree with the first comment, there is little written in the plot summary section and what is written does not provide a clear representation of the story. A concise synopsis of the beginning, middle, and end should be researched and provided. Perhaps an important topic to write about would be the context of the period that this story was written - 1935. Research on the modernist fiction post WWI would be beneficial in helping this article move out of the stub category.

While both links to the sources were retrievable, the first source could be deemed slightly unreliable. It is not a peer reviewed article, but rather a webpage article on telegraph.co.uk with no author cited. The source for the information on Fitzgerald's own life in connection to the story seemed to be a reliable source. Perhaps another source could be used and cited just to ensure the information provided is correct.

In order to ensure that this wiki article is reliable, there should be more research done on peer reviewed articles and books and they should be cited properly.

A section of themes may also be important to add to this article. Finding common areas of topic or concern in this story can be found by reading multiple peer reviewed books, articles, critiques, etc. Discussion themes may help to provide wiki readers with a deeper understanding of Fitzgerald's short story. Masonl2 (talk) 20:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC) LisaReply


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GiselleGuzman, Abbymarx.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

I just added a lot of content, but I'm not sure how to make this page not listed as a stub. Additionally, I didn't do tons of internal links, so any help adding more would be great. Thanks. Xolina

The plot summary says nothing about the plot at all12.240.42.205 15:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Babylon Revisited. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply