Talk:Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts

Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 6, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
December 16, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Australia: Melbourne / Cinema / Television Low‑importance

	Australia portal Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Film: Australian / Awards

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Awards Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 19:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Will get to this review soon. Ruby 2010/2013 19:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

"Geoffrey Rush, foundation and current President of AACTA" What do you mean by foundation? If you meant founder, I thought he was just named the president?

"...with the inaugural festival to be held in Sydney and Melbourne from October to November in 2011.[18]" Since they presumably already occurred, the tense needs to change.
"...members of the Academy can commence voting for films in all categories, while members of the Institute vote for the Best Short Animation and Best Short Fiction Film only.[19][20]" So members of the Institute only vote for those two categories? That seems odd
Use consistent publishers links (compare ref 5 to 7 for example)
Use consistent date formatting (2011-08-30 vs 19 August 2011 for example)
Ref 15: deitalicize publisher
imdb is not a reliable source
Refs 1, 2, 4, 6, 16, 17, 26 need retrieval dates

Not too many major issues here. Always happy to see an awards-related article be nominated to GA. I'll place the review on hold for seven days. Please respond here when you have finished with the corrections. Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 04:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your review! I have made the changes that you pointed out in your comments. In regards to the "...members of the Institute vote for the Best Short Animation and Best Short Fiction Film only" part, it seems to be just those categories that the AFI members can vote for. All other voting privileges appear to be only for Academy members. But I did see that there is a members' choice award that AFI members can vote for so I added that to the sentence. Thanks again! DonEd (talk) 11:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Interesting article. Happy to pass this one. Keep up the good work, Ruby 2010/2013 22:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much! DonEd (talk) 04:30, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic