Talk:Audlem

Assessment Report

1. Stub needs to be massively expanded.(See Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements for guidance.)
2. Photos need to be added.
3. Infobox needs to be added. (see Template:Infobox UK place/doc‎ for guidance.) Added 14 May 2007 by DDStretch.
4. References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, [[WP:V], and WP:CITE for guidance.)

 DDStretch  (talk) 20:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Vote to be part of Wales

I am removing this not because it is groundless, but because it has not been dealt with properly (and I don't have time at the moment). If this is to be included it should have its own sub-section and be properly referenced (see this link). Best Witchwooder (talk) 08:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

I am surprised given Audlem's distance from Wales its people would be voting, unless it was in the context of a portion of Cheshire county that at its west would border Wales.Cloptonson (talk) 12:39, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Audlem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091110080600/http://www.audlem-aset.org:80/ to http://audlem-aset.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)