Talk:Attributable fraction among the exposed
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Figure caption
editI believe in the figure caption the text "(AFe = 1/4)" is wrong. It should be (AFe = 1/3) as I_e = 12 I_u = 8 so AFe = (I_e-I_u)/I_e = 1/3. Unfortunately, I con't find the place to fix it. Nafradi (talk) 15:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! Fixed it. Psarka (talk) 16:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
AF and related formulas
editI think there's an error here and suggest checking an epi text before using these interpretations of the AF and related formulas.
Please tell me your concerns - possibly with a reference - and we´ll work it out. Further, I couldn´t find any reference to "AF" you mentioned in the article - please explain. Also please don´t forget to sign your post ;) T.pienn (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2010 (UTC) Moved original post to new section for better readabilitiy T.pienn (talk) 14:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Let's sort out some of the confusion
editI finally got around to try to improve things at least a little bit. I did investigate a few seemingly authoritative sources (most notably A Dictionary of Epidemiology and Statistical Methods in Medical Research), and I am now confident that the usage of the combinatorial explosion of terms {Population, Exposed} x {Atributable, _} x {Risk, Factor, Fraction} x {Percentage, _} is a complete mess :(
My currently favored approach would be to follow the Dictionary Of Epidemiology, and settle on the longer but explicit names: "Attributable fraction among the exposed" for (1 - RR) / RR, and "Attributable fraction for the population" for the P_e(RR-1)/(1 + P_e(RR - 1)). This Attributable risk percent (current name) is slightly tricky, as it is formally not equal to (1 - RR) / RR but rather that times 100%, so it contradicts the table. If you'd rather keep the "Attributable risk something" for the sake of symmetry with "Attributable risk", then I would propose "Attributable risk among the exposed": This drops the problematic percent thing and is present in both Dictionary of Epidemiology and Statistical Methods. Psarka (talk) 11:58, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Also, I made a (draft) page "Attributable fraction for the population": https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Attributable_fraction_for_the_population following the terms of the Dictionary of Epidemiology. What do you think about it? Psarka (talk) 13:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
You´re right, (1-R)/RR is not a percentage, so the naming itself is bad. Even worse, the formula in the worksheet https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Template:ARR_RRR_worksheet is probably wrong, too, I missed that one until now (in my defence, the line with ARP was introduced by https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Arcadian). If you have a reliable resource for this formula then please correct it, thank you. T.pienn (talk) 19:28, 16 May 2018 (UTC)