Talk:Assembly of Dust

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

POV

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

way bias "Though some are familiar with their history, many are not. Assembly of Dust is not a household name but rather a group that might be best described as "Micro celebrities" With a modest but devoted fan base who rally in support of this everyman's collective of working musicians.

"Assembly of Dust is a band that captures nuances of the American experience in story. The represent the Americana aesthetic that was so prominent in 1970's pop music but relatively under-represented commercial music today."

--Seth slackware 03:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

That was probably a copyvio. Fixed. Chubbles 22:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree that whomever wrote it had a bias tone - i tried to make it more accurate :user ReidGenauer OCt 7 2020

Notability etc

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

That template can probably be removed now. The article could still be improved but it has rudimentary citations and notability now. Instead of whacking on a template I prefer to try to fix the issues. ;-p

 I agree this article is sufficiently advanced and equal to most articles of its kind so I’ll remove the template. Robertwhyteus (talk) 21:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic