This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I wasn't able to upload the image via Flickypedia, so maybe not licensed appropriately. Hopefully someone will upload a photo of the building's exterior some day. ---Another Believer(Talk)01:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 months ago5 comments3 people in discussion
I'm really sorry about the fail. I think given the amount of rewriting required, it is more appropriate for some time to be taken and then resubmitted. I can already see the work TWOrantula is putting in is improving it a lot. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 03:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I do not appreciate that you left a review, then when a nominator started to address issues, you closed the process and failed the nomination. In my opinion, this is not in the spirit of collaboration. However, you've made your decision. I hope that if TrademarkedTWOrantula and I seek another review, you will let another editor review this time. Thanks ---Another Believer(Talk)03:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yep. Next time, try not to close a nomination as soon as you post your comments. Unless you can find a major issue that Another Believer and I feel that impedes the article from passing, don't quickfail the article right away. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 03:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry, I wasn't aware quickfail had to be at the exact same time as the review. It took me about ten minutes to confirm it should be quickfailed, as I wanted to read the guidelines before confirming. I'm sorry for missing you were editing the page TWOrantula. I will enter the quickfail at the same time as the review in the future.
TWOrantula; I definitely don't think I need nominator approval to quickfail.
Another Believer; I won't review the Bistro Agnes page. I'll also ask for a review of my conduct on the discussion board, and won't fail anything until it's discussed. I'll also get a few more reviews under my belt before I come back to an article you nominate. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 03:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
