Talk:Argument from miracles

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of religion

WP:NPOV

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Now, the article looks like "Criticism of mircles" and not as "Argument from miracles" - it should present the argument itself thoroughly and based on relevant sources, and then have a criticism section of proportional length.--Ioannes Pragensis 14:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

suggestion

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have two suggestions for the article. if no one be disagree i wii perform them in a few days:

first of all why not using template god arguments instead of two other templates? god arguments has link to page Argument from miracles as the same as two other templates. using these two templates links this article to some irrelevant articles and also repeated ones.
and second one is that why not using david hume opinions instead of dawkins opinions? hume is a great philosopher and the first one who seriously has criticized this argument.--ایرانی (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic