Talk:Archery at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Women's individual

Controversy???

Who the hell wrote "However Zhang's victory is controversial since some blames the Chinese spectators for Park's loss. That the Chinese audience would distract Park by shouting and whistle blowing throughout the entire game."??

1. This is like saying that the match is controversial because Zhang had a home-field advantage. Seriously? This is controversial? Jesus.

2. Go look up the match at http://www.nbcolympics.com/archery/video/all/index,page=2.htmx . I reviewed the gold medal match and this is a lie. The crowd might've been quieter for Zhang, but the noise level for Park's shots were hardly above murmur levels and I never heard any whistle-blowing. Even if there was a distinct level of noise and whistleblowing in a particular round it hardly justifies the use of the term "the entire game."

If no one can come up with a good argument to keep this statement it needs to be deleted promptly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ray192 (talk • contribs) 07:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Since no one provided a reason to keep this statement, I deleted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.166.142.144 (talk) 08:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

bronze match

shouldn't the bronze medal match be moved to the right? so that it's not under the gold medal match, and therefore a bit clearer on the page?? or is that not possible?? just looking at the coding, and doesn't seem like it is. oh well! 194.221.133.211 (talk) 10:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Archery 2008.png

The image File:Archery 2008.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Improvement to the Olympic Archery Champions articles.

Hi, I would like to see the Olympic Schedule added to all the Olympic Equestrian article's. But the Olympic individual gold medalist in Equestrian has at his (no woman has won the Olympic Ind. gold yet!) has a great idea on each Olympic Champions page, at the bottom is a "template" showing all Olympic Equestrian Champions in Individual Jumping. Have a look: [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.200.225 (talk) 05:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Archery at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Women's individual. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091118230618/http://www.archery.org:80/default.asp?s_id=0&link_id=74 to http://www.archery.org/default.asp?s_id=0&link_id=74
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080912090659/http://results.beijing2008.cn:80/WRM/ENG/INF/AR/C75A/ARW070000.shtml to http://results.beijing2008.cn/WRM/ENG/INF/AR/C75A/ARW070000.shtml#ARW070101

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 17 October 2016 (UTC)