Former good articleApple Inc. was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 2, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
October 19, 2006Good article nomineeListed
October 25, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 14, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
November 16, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 1, 2004, April 1, 2008, April 1, 2010, and April 1, 2016.
Current status: Delisted good article


Transcluding the lede

edit

@Adabow regarding your revert of my good faith edit, I see your point regarding the transclusion of templates like {{Good article}} which is problematic. I thought lack of inline references would have been acceptable, given that they're guaranteed to be updated from Apple Inc. and unions which has them without inline references, since they summarize existing inline text further below.

Would the text otherwise of the lede be acceptable, if manually copied over with inline reference for each claim? The bit about Foxconn investigations is one extra thing I would include/pull over from Apple Inc. and unions § China section. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 08:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm not familiar with the article (I reverted mostly because of the issue transcluding {{Good article}}) so I'll leave it up to you and other involved editors to decide what's the best course of action. Options are manually copying over the information or using a variation like {{Excerpt}}. Manual summary also has the advantage of focusing the text on what's most relevant for readers of the general/main article. Adabow (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Date of Apple logo with bitten apple

edit

Apple logo is with bitten apple since 2011 when Steve Jobs died, not 1998 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:5450:44F0:1555:31D3:3AE3:341C (talk) 07:34, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The bitten Apple is much older than 2011. gujamin (talk) 04:11, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Products - Mac

edit

I think that this text in the Products › Mac section:

Macintosh, commonly known as Mac [...]

should be changed to:

Mac, formerly known as Macintosh [...]

The "Macintosh" name for an Apple computer hasn't been used since the late 1990s/early 2000s: Power Macintosh G3 up to 1999 (The following G4 models were called "Power Mac G4"); Macintosh PowerBook G3 up to 2001 (the following laptops were just called "PowerBook G4"). No actual computer from Apple shows the term "Macintosh" anywhere.

The search for "macintosh" on Apple's site yields no actual products result. Jack 6502 (talk) 08:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done. Maxeto0910 (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Remove Al Gore from the board of directors. - Semi-protected edit request on 29 October 2024

edit

Remove Al Gore from the board of directors. He is no longer a board member. JodaDoesMusicAndStuff (talk) 04:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've removed Al Gore from the list. Beikeonbeogeo (talk) 17:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Info lacking interest

edit

I personally love Apple products and only have good feedback but when done reading through I felt tired like after reading a bedtime story,needs more excitement this is huge company / Brand. Cecilia Nortier (talk) 06:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Do you have specific suggestions for how this article can be improved? 331dot (talk) 09:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 20 November 2024

edit

As long as this is notable, add this page to Category:Virtual reality companies. 67.209.128.18 (talk) 11:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done for now: Apple currently does not "specialize" in virtual reality, and the Vision Pro does not seem a popular sale. I don't think Apple would be a virtual reality company. Thanks, Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 23:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Actually I disagree. On similar grounds, Meta does not "specialize" in virtual reality, and yet if we were to exclude such major players in the industry it would make for a weird list. — HTGS (talk) 01:26, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
When I search online for VR companies, I don't find a single list of such companies that doesn't include Apple. - Aoidh (talk) 01:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply