Talk:Antiscience
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Tgeorgescu in topic Anti-science not necessarily means anti-intellectualism t
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antiscience article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anti-science not necessarily means anti-intellectualism t
editIt should be more objective to say: Anti-science is a set of attitudes involves a rejection of current science, or current scientific method, or current scientific practice, or current scientific consensus. Interestingly, Skepticism is consider one of important element in science. Science is evolving, one reject current science may accept future science, or vice versa. Cloud29371 (talk) 02:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- We can't reject future science, because we don't know what that will be. Science evolves, every learned person knows this.
- But, to the point: highly intellectual professors, who are postmodernists, usually distrust science. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)