Talk:Anion-conducting channelrhodopsin

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Millencolin

I think the line for stGtACR2 should be removed. It is the same protein as GtACR2, the only difference is it contains an additional trafficking sequence. If Trafficking sequences make unique opsins than the Mardinly et al 2018 paper has created ST-eGtACR1, ST-eiC++, and ST-ePsuACR (same as PsACR). 128.32.177.186 (talk) 16:30, 2 May 2018 (UTC)ianReply

Good point! Will take care of it. Millencolin (talk) 11:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply