Talk:Anime and manga fandom in Poland

Latest comment: 10 days ago by Di (they-them) in topic Article title

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Created by Piotrus (talk) and Oliwiasocz (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 529 past nominations.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:57, 10 October 2024 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   "One of the first" could readily be problematic, as with other "first" hooks. Are there any potential ALTs? Otherwise the article checks out.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Crisco 1492: Fair point. Here are some ALTs, backed up by the text (and refs cited). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Article title

edit

Is there a reason the article uses "manga and anime" as opposed to "anime and manga"? Every other Wikipedia article about a general concept that mentions both has it with anime first (anime and manga, anime and manga fandom, anime and manga convention, glossary of anime and manga, etc), whereas with manga first it's only used in proper nouns. Link20XX (talk) 04:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I believe the title should follow the same format at the other pages. I'm gonna WP:BOLDly change the title, hopefully it's not controversial. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)Reply