Talk:Ancient UNIX

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

V5 vs SysV

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

To the well-meaning person who redirected the V5 link to UNIX System V: Unix versioning is rather complicated, and differs radically based on what part of the family tree you're talking about. Fifth Edition is actually a Research Unix and predates the earliest versions of SysV by over a decade; as far as I know it was never released commercially, and operated at only about 50 sites. (Frankly, the only freely available SysV version, OpenSolaris, would probably plow a GBA into the ground and bury it. V5 is far more lightweight.) Haikupoet (talk) 04:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Compatibility layer vs. Emulator

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I made an edit to change a piped link to not go to compatibility layer, but instead go to emulator. I think it's just important that people know the difference between these two things. An emulator recreates the hardware to be emulated in software, and some examples are SIMH and QEMU and AppleWin and MAME and VisualBoyAdvance. However, a compatibility layer is a different thing entirely. It does not emulate hardware, it just changes system calls from one format to another. E.g. one example, Wine translates calls to the Windows API into native Linux calls, and the FreeBSD OS has a compatibility layer for older GNU/Linux applications which translates Linux calls into calls for the FreeBSD kernel (often simply called kFreeBSD). This Talk: Page edit may be directly in violation of Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, and if it is, I'm sorry, but I'm trying better to be bold, and I think that knowing this (and that Wikipedia has articles on both things) is important not only to the well-being of this article, but, like, a zillion other ones. --Cogburnd02 (talk) 20:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please add years in which versions came out

Thanks, 19:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.67.81.24 (talk)

Add topic