 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Neuron Corporation
editHi folks, I'm not seeing any source that now claims Alpha and Neuron have the relationship stated in the text. I'd say we have good evidence there is a strong relationship, based on the source. But the claimed relationship, as a successor Neuron, isn't in the source cited (at least not any more). Hobit (talk) 15:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- The word "successor" may not be ideal. If the cited source is correct then the one company was set up by the same people, or some of the same people, who had been responsible for the other company, in order to carry on similar business after the original company was no longer operating, and that relationship can reasonably be described as being a "successor" company, but on the other hand the word could be interpreted as implying a legal connection as a continuation of the same business, which probably is not the case. Therefore, it would probably be a good idea for someone to substitute an alternative form of wording which conveys essentially the same information in a less ambiguous form. I don't see that as a substantial problem. JBW (talk) 17:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- To make my position on this clear, (in all due respect) I couldn't give a rats about the content dispute, hence I'll keep out of that. On the other hand I do give a rats about blatant COI editing, corporate whitewashing, sockpuppetry and block evasion. Honestly, if Alpha motors corporation wants to improve their corporate image, they could start by avoiding this sort of carry-on. Mako001 (talk) 02:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Crystal
editGiven this company has not in fact made one single commercially available car is it not a bit early to have an article on it?Slatersteven (talk) 18:03, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Slatersteven: The company exists and there's WP:SIGCOV. All info about future plans are sourced, too. If the company turns to be a fraud or files for bankruptcy then the article can be slightly changed to state that.
WaddlesGobbles 🍂 🦃 20:22, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 2 January 2022
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I like to add the logo file Alpha_Motor_Corporation_Logo.jpg for alpha motor corporation Zackyboyman (talk) 01:59, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Not done: Please make your request for a new image to be uploaded to Files For Upload. Once the file has been properly uploaded, feel free to reactivate this request to have the new image used. - PianoDan (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Zackyboyman: I've added the logo for you. Waddles 🗩 🖉 06:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Undeclared Paid Editing tag
editFor concerns of WP:UPE on this article, as well as info on COI editing, edit warring and sockpuppetry (all from 2021 to 2024) see the following thread at WP:COIN [1], specifically the following posts: [2] and [3]. Axad12 (talk) 02:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
AFD
editIs there any evidence this is anything more than a concept? Slatersteven (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)