This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
"Nowhere near notable enough" is not only subjective but it implies a bias that indicates recognition of the subject person and dismissal of their notability. Yet nothing else is provided other than that opinion, there's no clarification on why the person expressing the opinion is already aware of the person but deems her unfit for inclusion. As an influencer with (as of June 2020) over 2 million followers, some explanation should be provided about why the subject person is "not notable." Perhaps it was true six years ago, but is not now? Without explanation, and in consideration of those millions of followers, I (the one too lazy to log in) do not believe this page should be deleted.
67.185.241.166 (talk) 07:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article is very much backdated. The „free paintings“ that she is said to do until „today“ are quoted from a 2007 source. Nothing from her career of the last seven years since 2015 is mentioned. Pls update, the current article is not acceptable. 2003:C9:6F19:699:BC70:FCDD:2906:ED9E (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
